rushilkumar27 The days where commuter motorcycles were becoming monotonous are long gone. Even if one may still purchase a standard commuter motorbike, some individuals are starting to wonder whether they wouldn’t be better off investing a little more money on something more exciting and equipped. The TVS Raider and the Bajaj Pulsar NS125 rightly fit under this category.
With the brand-new Raider 125, TVS Motor Company has made a comeback in the 125cc motorbike market in India. The new Raider 125 has a stunning appearance and has several industry-first innovations. It is highly distinctive and distinguishes itself from its competitors, who are mainly high-end commuters. But Bajaj Auto also just introduced the brand-new Pulsar NS125 in India, a bare-chested streetfighter that directly competes with the Raider 125. How do these brand-new 125cc motorcycles compare to one another? That is what our specification-based comparison of the Raider 125 and Bajaj Pulsar NS125 will reveal.
Looks
The older Pulsar NS models, such as the NS160 and NS200, served as design influences for the NS125’s aesthetics. Even though the design is somewhat dated, the geometric shapes and paint jobs still make it seem forceful and stunning.
The Raider is brand-new and has a design that some people may find excessive. However, it appears like a suitable alternative to commuter bikes, which are often designed to appeal to a broad consumer base. Because of its unique shape and yellow paint schemes, the Raider certainly sticks out on the road.
The Bajaj Pulsar NS125 is shorter than the TVS Raider 125, and it also has a little more ground clearance. The Pulsar NS125 beats out the new Raider 125 in terms of total fuel tank capacity, breadth, height, and wheelbase. But what’s interesting is that the Bajaj Pulsar NS125 weighs about 21 kg more than the Raider 125, which is a much lighter motorcycle.
Specifications
The Raider has a 124.8 cc single-cylinder engine with a three-valve layout, air-oil cooling, and fuel injection as its power source. It has a maximum output of 11.22 bhp at 7,500 rpm and a maximum torque of 11.2 Nm at 6,000 rpm. It is coupled to a 5-speed transmission.
The Pulsar NS125, on the other hand, has a two-valve, air-cooled engine that produces a maximum of 11.82 bhp at 8,500 rpm and a maximum of 11 Nm at 7,000 rpm. It also has a 5-speed transmission. Compare bikes in India on these bases before buying.
Features
With an additional USB port, Bluetooth including turn-by-turn navigation, a watch, under-seat storage, Lighting systems, a reverse LCD, or a 5-inch TFT screen, the Raider outshines the competition in terms of amenities.
The Pulsar NS125 features an analog rev counter and a semi-digital instrument cluster, which some individuals do provide. There are no further features available, and the only LED illumination is in the tail lights.
Both the new Raider 125 and the Bajaj Pulsar NS125 are equipped with telescopic front forks and a gas-charge mono-shock at the back. Both motorcycles have a drum brake in the back for braking purposes. The Raider 125 is available with both a disc and a drum brake unit, while the Pulsar NS 125 only has a disc brake at the front. Additionally, these motorcycles include a combined brake system and 17-inch tubeless tires. The TVS Raider 125 has many more features than the Pulsar NS 125, including an all-digital TFT instrument cluster that is packed with useful data, compared to the NS 125’s rudimentary semi-digital semi-analogue console.
Price and colour
Pulsar NS125 price is 1,05,598 and Raider 125’s price is 90,524 (both prices ex-showroom). The Bajaj Pulsar NS125 comes in four colours and one version. The TVS 125 comes in four colours and three variants. Addition to costs, you may compare these motorcycles based on their displacement, mileage, efficiency, and a variety of other factors. To assist people in choosing wisely between the Bajaj Pulsar NS125 and Raider 125, comparisons between these two motorcycles have been make. Compared to the Bajaj Bikes, the Raider is less in price and has a lot more equipment. Read more comparisons like this at autoX.
